This New York
Times article discusses the speculation that Secretary of State Colin Powell would not serve
in his current position if President Bush won re-election.
Powell and everyone around the reports deny them, and various notions for where
the rumors came from are mentioned, including that Democrats might want to
weaken the President's chances of re-election (since Powell is far more moderate
than Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al.), or that
Rumsfeld and other more right-wing administration members who have tusseled with
Powell might want to force the issue of his resignation.
I'm of two minds on the issue, really. Powell has seemed an eminently
reasonable man in office, in sharp contrast to Bush's cronies elsewhere, so in
the fairly likely event of a Bush re-election, I'd like there to be some
moderation left over in his government. On the other hand, if his resignation
really did destabilize the Bush regime so that enough moderates would switch
votes to a Democratic candidate, I'm all
for him resigning.
The problem is obviously that you never know what the consequences would be if
he resigned. What if he left and Bush won anyway? What kind of SecState would
Bush appoint? If you want to push me one way or the other, then, and make me
choose right now, I'm going to support Powell staying in office. If nothing
else, he was educated in South Bronx public
schools; I can use him as a role model for my kids.
Tweetblog comments powered by Disqus