The New York Times has this article
about Eva Moskowitz, the New York City Council's Education Committee chairwoman,
saying that the reforms to special education as part of the educational system
overhaul are too extreme.
The idea of the reforms is to put more of the emphasis in the schools, rather
than at district offices, and that is no different on the special education side
of things. Moskowitz says, however, that too few principals have enough special
education experience to be fairly held so accountable for their programs. She
also notes that, while in theory, the principals would have assistant principals
that would focus on special education, the reality is that there is not enough
money to do this.
Personally, I could go back and forth on this. I think it is important to let
the people on the front lines make as many decisions as possible, and thus be
held as accountable as possible. On the other hand, as Moskowitz says, those
front line people often don't have the necessary training, and there isn't
enough money to hire lots and lots of new administrators who all do have the
training. I think I'm ever so slightly inclined to agree with Moskowitz in this
case, that perhaps Joel Klein and Mike Bloomberg were a little hasty in their
restructuring.
However, Moskowitz then said something I disagree with:
Ms. Moskowitz said that special needs students should be identified
as early as possible. "I believe that we should be identifying children at the
age of 3," she said. "We can't wait till the fourth-grade test to find out that
children can't read."
While it's true that we can't wait until fourth grade to find out a kid can't
read, to be testing and trying to identify kids at three years old seems
premature. We have far too many diagnoses of ADD/ADHD and other disabilities as
it is; I wouldn't want to see what would happen to the special education
roll-call if we started adding kids to the list who tested into the program at
three.
If nothing else, it smacks of tracking, which, while we do it in the United
States, we don't do it as extremely as it's done in much of the rest of the
world, where it's essentially decided what kind of job you'll be getting to work
in, or even before, high school. I'd rather not push what tracking we do have
even further down the line, deciding that this three year old can go to college
in the future, while that one is going to have to be a typist at best.
Tweetblog comments powered by Disqus